To ensure this card got the support it deserved, we upgraded Mesa to the version 17 (or 13.1 in the old versioning scheme) stack from the xorg-edgers PPA.Ī great deal of early Linux Ryzen 1800X benchmarks were released on Michael Larabel’s Phoronix site, based on their test suite, and for the most part, these showed an eminently capable processor that certainly gave Intel a run for its money. As an aside, we should mention that havingĪ modern AMD card meant that we could benefit from the new AMDGPU driver model, which allows you to have entirely open-source video drivers. Since AMD added a lot of Ryzen-specific code to Kernel 4.10 (some of it has been backported to 4.9), we figured we should stick with this, but instead, we opted to use the second beta of Ubuntu MATE 17.04 so that we could enjoy the general refresh of system packages. So rather than mess around with ugly patching and manual installs, we raided Zak Storey’s bountiful cupboard and purloined a Radeon 470X. These went away when we used the 4.10 kernel from, but that caused other problems, specifically that the Nvidia driver doesn’t build against this, and we neglected to mention that our machine also had an Nvidia 1080 in it. You can support the site directly via Paypal donations ☕. TNR earns Amazon affiliate commissions from qualifying purchases.However, we encountered spurious segfaults during our kernel compilation tests, which was odd, because other tests worked OK and the machine was certainly stable. ![]() We started with a fresh install of Ubuntu 16.10, which certainly booted and seemed to work. Fortunately, we’d already done this, using the aforesaid top-of-the-line Ryzen 1800X CPU, 16GB of RAM and ASUS’s high-end AM4 motherboard, the RoG Crosshair VI Hero. Our first task was to get a working test bed set up. Also worth remembering is that new hardware has teething issues - over the coming weeks and months, we will very likely hear tell of things that don’t work as well as they should, and of the resulting fixes. Benchmarking is a dark art, and it’s worth keeping in mind that Linux and Windows benchmarks can differ wildly. The 7700K also happens to cost significantly less than the Ryzen 7 1800X that features in our tests, so we shall make careful comparisons between these two bits of silicon, too. Sure, it has half as many cores/threads, but multithreading is hard for heterogeneous workloads like gaming, so this won’t be much of a detriment. In many ways, the 7700K is the more natural competitor. These match the Ryzen 7’s 8-core/16-thread makeup, but also cost well above the budget of many a gaming enthusiast - the top-of-the-line i7 6950X retails in Australia. In the official launch announcement, its makers were keen to extol its performance compared to the top-of-the-line previous-gen Broadwell-E chips. But how does it work on Linux? And what of AMD’s wider open-source strategy? Armed with a few review samples, a fresh install of Phoronix Test Suite and an insatiable thirst for filling-in spreadsheet data, we give Ryzen the APC once-over. But also one that falters a little when it comes to single-core performance and serious gaming, at least compared to Intel’s latest Kaby Lake flagship, the 7700K. ![]() More precisely, we’ve seen a cheap chip that does exceptionally well for professional workloads such as video transcoding. We’ve seen some impressive benchmarks on the Windows side and we’ve also seen a few shortcomings. ![]() Free market economics says that should mean better performance and prices for everyone, after all.Īt least, once retailers have AMD back in stock. It ticks all the boxes on paper, but how well is Ryzen supported, and how well does it perform, on Linux? Jonni Bidwell fires up the APC test bench.ĪMD being competitive with Intel once again is an exciting prospect.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |